Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 18:06
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Kate Middleton and Princess Charlotte Opt for Aquamarine for Trooping the Colour 2025 - Vogue
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Mariners' vibes turn ugly after sweep: 'Nobody feels sorry for us' - The Seattle Times
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
When did washing a dog exhaust you very quickly?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
What's the point of gender reassignment surgery which doesn't change a person's chromosomes?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Why is Meghan Markle's Hollywood presence fading despite her royal status and Netflix deal?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Has anyone shared his wife with a friend? How was it?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Rocket Report: Northrop backs Firefly and names its rocket; Xodiac will fly no more - Ars Technica